The Effect of Local Counterpart Funding Delay on Procurement of Donor Funded Projects

Authors

  • S. Kotey, Department of Building Technology, Cape Coast Polytechnic, Ghana
  • G. Nani Department of Building Technology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana

Keywords:

Local, Counterpart, Funding, Projects and Delay

Abstract

Local counterpart funding and community development in infrastructural project delivery has been very important in the lives of the rural poor. This is by improving the quality of life of the people through improved access to basic infrastructural development and services. Lack of proper flow of counterpart funding has affected many projects in Ghana but the impact of foreign aid to developing countries has been so helpful. This has improved public procurement delivery performance in the country. The country has received overwhelming development assistance from donor partners over the years. The Government of Ghana in an effort to protect and to effectively utilize these funds partly provides proportion of the needed funds to ensure that Donor funds are properly managed and used for the intended purpose. In this research, the effect of Local Counterpart Funding delays on Procurement of Donor Funded Projects is explored by identifying the factors causing delays and the effect of local counterpart funding delay on Donor funded public projects procurement delivery in Ghana. Selected stakeholders were included a questionnaire survey which was used to elicit firsthand information on Local counterpart funds and donor funded project delivery in Ghana. Purposive sampling technique was employed to select 85 respondents during the study. It was revealed that most community projects depend on external support for its execution. However, donor funded community project initiatives have been supported with local counterpart funding and this has been very beneficial to most communities. It was also identified that the most critical variables influencing local counterpart funding and donor funded project delivery are: bureaucracy in the procurement system, acquisition of land, poor information dissemination and lack of communication between parties.  Generally, time and cost overruns have been noted as the key effects of delays in local counterpart funding on donor funded projects.

Author Biographies

S. Kotey,, Department of Building Technology, Cape Coast Polytechnic, Ghana

A Lecturer at the Department of Building Technology, Cape Coast Polytechnic.

G. Nani, Department of Building Technology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana

A Lecturer at the Department of Building Technology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology.

References

Abdullah, M. R. and Rahman, I. A. and Abdul Azis, A. A. (2010). Causes of Delay in Mara Management Procurement Construction Projects. Journal of Surveying, Construction and Property; 1 (1): 123-138.

Aibinu, A.A. and Jagboro, G.O. (2002). The effects of construction delay on project delivery in Nigerian construction industry. International Journal of Project Management; 20: 593-599.

Akukwe, C. (1999). Community participation in international health: practical recommendations for donor and recipient organizations. Pan American Journal of Public Health; 5(3):137-43.

Andreski, A. (2008). Case Study of Road Funds in Ghana, Malawi and Tanzania, [hppt://www.gtkp.com/assets], (accessed 2014 June 23).

Aryeetey, E. and Cox, A. (2001). Foreign Aid in Africa Report: Learning from country experiences (Aid Effectiveness in Ghana), [hppt://www.rrojasdatabank.info/r p2005-58] (accessed 2014 May 7).

Badu, E., Owusu-Manu, D., Edward D.J. and Holt, G.D. (2011). Innovative financing (IF) of infrastructure projects in Ghana: conceptual and empirical observations. Engineering Project Organization Journal; 1 (4): 255-268. [hppt://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=17097671], (accessed 2014 May 23).

Bagaka, O. (2008). Fiscal decentralization in Kenya and the growth of government: The Constituency development fund, [http://www.ijern.com/journal/], (accessed 2014 December 23).

Braimah, I. and Obeng Nti, K. (2010). Community Response to the Counterpart Funding Policy in Poverty Reduction Projects in Ghana. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa: In 2012 Study on Forest Financing, Advisory Group on Finance Collaborative Partnership on Forests, [hppt://www.un.org/esa/forests/pdf/AGF_Study_July_2012], (accessed 2014 June 26).

Bruton, H. and Hill, C. (1991). The Development Impact of Counterpart Funds Prepared for the Agency for International Development under Contract No. PDC-0095-WK-9053-00.

Chimulwa, W. (2004). Budgeting, Donor Assistance, Co-Funding and Service Delivery in Local Governments. A Case Study Eu-Mpp Projects in Busia District 2004/HD10/2671U Available from hppt://www.mubs.ac.ug/.../Budgeting, [Accessed: 23rd May 2014].

Frary, R. B. (1996). ‘Hints for designing effective questionnaires’, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 5(3): 1-6.

International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (2012). Availability of counterpart funds, compliance with loan covenants. [hppt://www.ifad.org/operations/projects], (accessed 2014 August 23).

Kimenyi, S. M. (2005). Efficiency and efficacy of Kenya's Constituency Development Fund. Theory and Evidence. University of Connecticut, U.S.A.

Mettle-Nunoo, R. and Hilditch, L. (2000). Donor Participation in the Education Sector in Ghana Report prepared for Action Aid. Available from, [hppt://www.actionaid.org.uk/sites/default], (accessed: 2013 December 23).

Mosley, P. and Hudson, J. and Horrell, S. (1987). "Aid, the public sector and the market in less developed countries," Economic Journal, 97(387): 616–641.

Riddell, R. (1996). Aid in the 21st century. New York, NY: Office of Development Studies, United Nations Development Programme.

Roemer, M. (1988). The Macroeconomics of Counterpart funds. A discussion paper 262, [http://www.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNABL297], (accessed 2014 June 2).

Satterthwaite, D. (2002). Local funds, and their potential to allow donor agencies to support community development and poverty reduction in urban areas: 14(1). [http://www.intrac.org], (accessed 2014 April 3)

Schubeler, P. (1996). Participation and Partnership in urban infrastructure management, UMP, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. [http://www.elibrary.worldbank.org/doi], (accessed 2014 March 6).

Stein, A. (2001). Participation and Sustainability in Social Projects: The Experience of the Local Development Programme (PRODEL) in Nicaragua, [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dpu-projects/21st_Century], (accessed 2014 April 16).

Tanaka, S. (2006). A Review of Community-Driven Development and its Application to the Asian Development Bank.

World Bank (1993). World development report: investing in health. New York: Oxford University Press.[http://www.openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5976], (2014 July 23).

World Bank. (2003a). “Economic Report on Ghanaâ€, Washington, DC: Ghana Country Department, The World Bank, [http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en], (accessed 2014 August 23).

Downloads

Published

2015-10-27

How to Cite

Kotey, S., & Nani, G. (2015). The Effect of Local Counterpart Funding Delay on Procurement of Donor Funded Projects. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH, 2(2). Retrieved from https://www.ajaronline.com/index.php/AJAR/article/view/126