Investigation of Performance of Nano Silica Cement Additive on Sulphate Attack In Geothermal Wells

Authors

  • G.N. Luswata Geothermal Energy Training and Research Institute, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Private bag-10143 Mweiga Road, Kenya.
  • D. Onyancha Department of Chemistry, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Private bag-10143 Mweiga Road, Kenya.
  • J. N. Thuo Department of Civil Engineering, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Private bag-10143 Mweiga Road, Kenya.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26437/ajar.v9i1.518

Keywords:

Cement-elongation. ettringite. permeability. porosity. sulphate attack

Abstract

Purpose: This research was intended to evaluate Nano silica as an additive to improve the sulphate resistance of cement used in geothermal wells.

Design/ Methodology/ Approach: Sulphate resistance was determined by measuring the longitudinal change in cement cube specimens that were cured in sodium sulphate solution for 21 days. Cube specimens with varied concentrations of Nano silica (0%, 0.3%, 0.6%, 0.9% and 1.2%) were used in the study. Five separate solutions were maintained at 23℃, 40℃, 65℃, 70℃ and 80℃ for 21 days. Final length measurements were taken and compared as a percentage of initial length measurements.

Findings: Beyond 65℃, the sulphate resistance of cement improved for each percentage concentration of Nano silica replacement. Control specimens with 0% Nano silica had the most inferior performance at all temperatures. Higher concentrations of 1.2% and 0.6% Nano silica replacement gave the most resistance between 23℃ and 65℃. A lower concentration of 0.3% proved more suitable between 65℃ and 80℃.

Research limitation: The results of the experiment indicate performance in low-temperature geothermal wells.

Practical implications: The application of this additive can improve the durability and strength of the cement, reducing the potential for degradation due to exposure to sulphates. This can lead to a longer lifespan of the geothermal well, reducing maintenance costs and increasing its overall efficiency.

Social implications: Improved cement designs that create longer-lasting cement sheaths can be developed from this research, thereby fostering geothermal energy development. The option to replace certain volumes of cement with Nano silica contributes to a reduction of the carbon footprint by minimising the demand for, and therefore the production of cement.  

Originality/ Value/ Novelty: Previous research that tested cement at high temperatures analysed mechanical resistance. This research examined the sulphate resistance of cement at high temperatures.

Author Biographies

G.N. Luswata, Geothermal Energy Training and Research Institute, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Private bag-10143 Mweiga Road, Kenya.

She is a Postgraduate student at Geothermal Energy Training and Research Institute, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri,  Private bag-10143 Mweiga Road, Kenya.

D. Onyancha, Department of Chemistry, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Private bag-10143 Mweiga Road, Kenya.

He is a Senior Lecturer at Department of Chemistry, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri,  Private bag-10143 Mweiga Road, Kenya.

J. N. Thuo, Department of Civil Engineering, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Private bag-10143 Mweiga Road, Kenya.

He is a Lecturer at Department of Civil Engineering, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri,  Private bag-10143 Mweiga Road, Kenya.

References

Al-Amoudi, O. S., Al-Amoudi, M. M., & Baghabra, O. S. (1999). Mechanisms of sulfate attack in plain and blended cement: a review. Proceeding of the International Seminar, 247–260.

Batilov, I. B. (2016). Sulfate Resistance of Nanosilica Contained Portland Cement Sulfate Resistance of Nanosilica Contained Portland Cement Mortars Mortars Repository Citation (Issue December). https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/2850

Bensted, J., Brough, A. R., & Page, M. M. (2007). Chemical degradation of concrete. The durability of Concrete and Cement Composites, 86–135. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845693398.86

Brandl, A., Cutler, J., Seholm, A., Sansil, M., Braun, G., & Incorporated, B. H. (2011). Cementing Solutions for Corrosive Well Environments. June 2010, 8–10. https://www.onepetro.org/journal-paper/SPE-132228-PA

Brier, J., & Jayanti, L. D. (2015). Chemistry 2e (Vol. 21, Issue 1). http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/JKM/article/view/2203

Gaurina-Medimurec, N., Matanovic, D., & Krklec, G. (1994). Cement slurries for geothermal well cementing. Rudarsko Geolosko Naftni Zbornik, 6(December 1994), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(95)92408-a

Ghafoori, N., Batilov, I., & Najimi, M. (2020). Resistance to Sulfate Attack of Mortars Containing Colloidal Nanosilica and Silica Fume. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32(12), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003458

Ghafoori, N., Batilov, I., Najimi, M., & Sharbaf, M. (2018). Sodium Sulfate Resistance of Mortars Containing Combined Nanosilica and Microsilica. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30(7), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)mt.1943-5533.0002318

Horszczaruk, E., Sikora, P., Cendrowski, K., & Mijowska, E. (2017). The effect of elevated temperature on the properties of cement mortars containing nano silica and heavyweight aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 137, 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.003

Huang, J., Wang, Z., Li, D., & Li, G. (2022). Effect of Nano-SiO2/PVA Fiber on Sulfate Resistance of Cement Mortar Containing High-Volume Fly Ash. Nanomaterials, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12030323

Huang, Q., Zhu, X., Zhao, L., Zhao, M., Liu, Y., & Zeng, X. (2020). Effect of nano silica on sulfate resistance of cement mortar under partial immersion. Construction and Building Materials, 231, 117180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117180

Khan, K., Ahmad, W., Amin, M. N., & Nazar, S. (2022). Nano-Silica-Modified Concrete: A Bibliographic Analysis and Comprehensive Review of Material Properties. Nanomaterials, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12121989

Lin, Q., Xu, Z., Lan, X., Ni, Y., & Lu, C. (2011). The reactivity of nano-silica with calcium hydroxide. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, 99 B(2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31891

Locher, F. W. (1966). Stoichiometry of tricalcium silicate hydration. Symposium on Structure of Portland Cement Paste and Concrete, Rep. No. 9(1), 300–308.

Makwana, D., Bellani, J., Verma, H. K., Khatri, D., & Shah, M. (2021). Emergence of nano silica for oil and gas well cementing: application, challenges, and future scope. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(28), 37110–37119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14633-8

Morales, M., Morris, W., Criado, M. A., Robles, J., Bianchi, G., Antonio, S., & Int, P. (2003). SPE 81000 Improving the Sulfate Resistance Performance of API cement Class A upon Appropriate Slurry Design. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 8–10.

Moslemi, A. M., Khosravi, A., Izadinia, M., & Heydari, M. (2014). Application of Nano Silica in concrete for enhanced resistance against sulfate attack. Advanced Materials Research, 829(May), 874–878. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.829.874

Nie, L., Li, X., Li, J., Zhu, B., & Lin, Q. (2022). Analysis of High Performance Concrete Mixed with Nano-Silica in Front of Sulfate Attack. 1–17.

Okumu, V. A. (2018). Suitability of the Kenyan Blended Portland Cements for Structural Concrete Production. Journal of Sustainable Research in Engineering, 4(2), 55–68. http://sri.jkuat.ac.ke/ojs/index.php/sri

Philippacopoulos, A. J., & Berndt, M. L. (2002). Structural analysis of geothermal well cements. Geothermics, 31(6), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6505(02)00029-9

Rzepka, M., & Kȩdzierski, M. (2020). The use of nanomaterials in shaping the properties of cement slurries used in drilling. Energies, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123121

Scrivener, K. L., Damidot, D., & Famy, C. (1999). Possible mechanisms of expansion of concrete exposed to elevated temperatures during curing (also known as DEF) and implications for avoidance of field problems. Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, 21(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1520/cca10513j

Sherif, M. A. (2017). Effect of Elevated Temperature on Mechanical Properties of Nano Materials Concrete. Int. J. Eng. Innov. Technol, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VH48E

Skalny, J. P., Marchand, J., & Odler, I. (2003). Sulfat Attack on Conrete. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.com/books?id=0ZN-z35qV1sC&pgis=1

Smith, L. . (1986). paper_6_-_smith.pdf. NEW ZEALAND CONCRETE SOCIETY 22ND TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, 35–38. https://concretenz.org.nz/resource/resmgr/docs/conf/1986/paper_6_-_smith.pdf

Teodoriu, C., Yi, M. C., & Salehi, S. (2019). A novel experimental investigation of cement mechanical properties with application to geothermal wells. Energies, 12(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12183426

Thakkar, A., Raval, A., Chandra, S., Shah, M., & Sircar, A. (2020). A comprehensive review of the application of nano-silica in oil well cementing. Petroleum, 6(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2019.06.005

Tobón, J., Payá, J., & Restrepo, O. (2015). Study of durability of Portland cement mortars blended with silica nanoparticles. Construction and Building Materials, 80, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.074.The

Traegardh, J., & Bellmann, F. (2007). Sulphate attack. Structural Survey, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/ss.2001.11019bab.003

Wang, S., Wu, L., Jiang, G., Jian, L., Zhang, T., Chen, S., & Chen, L. (2020). A high temperature composite cement for geothermal application. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 195(April), 107909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107909

Winter, N. (2009). Understanding cement. In WHD Microanalysis Consultants Ltd.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-29

How to Cite

Luswata, G., Onyancha, D., & Thuo, J. N. (2023). Investigation of Performance of Nano Silica Cement Additive on Sulphate Attack In Geothermal Wells. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.26437/ajar.v9i1.518